Posts Tagged MLN Matters

image_pdfimage_print

The Cohen Report: NCCI 16.3 Analysis for Edits Effective October 1, 2010

From MMP’s friend Frank Cohen:

I have completed my analysis of NCCI version 16.3, including an analysis of the changes from the last quarter release (version 16.2) to the current release. Here are my summary findings:

  • Currently, for version 16.3, there are 688,013 active edit pairs, meaning that, if the procedure codes listed in column 1 and column 2 were to be billed together by the same physician on the same patient on the same day, it is likely that payment would either be denied or the payment amount would be reduced.
  • In addition, there are 221,954 terminated edit pairs, which are pairs of codes that at one time were active but under the current version, no longer indicate a restriction of their use as a code pair. For version 6.3, 19,667 new edit pairs have been added to the database while 35 have been terminated, for a net gain of 19,932 new edit pairs. For this version, all have an effective and/or termination date of October 1, 2010 or September 30, 2010.
  • There were changes to the modifier indicator for 83 edit pairs with 8 going from an indicator of 0 (no modifier allowed) to 1 (modifier allowed) and the remaining 75 going from a modifier indicator of 1 to a modifier indicator of 0.
  • There are now 1,396 duplicate pairs present in the database, a gain of 20 from version 16.2. Duplicate pairs are edit pairs that were, at one time active, then were terminated and then made active again.
  • There are also 5,360 swapped edit pairs, which are those that were introduced in one particular order (i.e., column 1 code was 99333 and column 2 code was 92014), terminated and then reintroduced in the opposite order (i.e., column 1 code is now 92014 and column 2 code is now 99333).
I have created a set of worksheets that contain the data associated to this analysis and it is available for immediate download (no charge) at www.frankcohen.com. Click on the Download tab and it should be the second or third link on the page. If you have any questions, feel free to email me at frank@frankcohen.com. Frank Cohen, MPA, MBB at The Frank Cohen Group, LLC.

NOTE: In the MLN Matters announcing the October edits was also this newsflash:

Get your NEW How to Use the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) Tools booklet from the MLN and learn how to navigate the CMS NCCI website. This new MLN product explains how to look up Medicare code pair edits and Medically Unlikely Edits (MUEs). NCCI tools can help providers avoid coding and billing errors and subsequent payment denials. If you want to become familiar with the “National Correct Coding Initiative Policy Manual for Medicare Services” and the tools on the NCCI website, this is your best resource! Click here to download a pdf of the booklet.

Posted in: Medicare & Reimbursement, The Cohen Report (NCCI & RVUs)

Leave a Comment (4) →

CMS Delivers Additional Information Regarding Medicare Timely Filing Rule

In the MLN Matters dated July 30, 2010, Change Request (CR) 7080, CMS gives additional instructions on the timely filing rule*:

  • For institutional claims that include span dates of service (i.e., a “From” and “Through” date span on the claim), the “Through” date on the claim will be used to determine the date of service for claims filing timeliness.
  • For professional claims (CMS-1500 Form and 837P) submitted by physicians and other suppliers that include span dates of service, the line item“From” date will be used to determine the date of service and filing timeliness. (This includes supplies and rental items).  For physicians and other suppliers that bill claims with span dates, these span date services cannot exceed one month.
Day 282: insurance sucks

Image by bookgrl via Flickr

  • BE AWARE: If a line item “From” date is not timely, but the “To” date is timely, Medicare contractors will split the line item and deny untimely services as not timely filed.
  • Claims having a date of service of February 29th must be filed by February 28th of the following year to be considered as timely filed. If the date of service is February 29th of any year and is received on or after March 1st of the following year, the claim will be denied as having failed to meet the timely filing requirement.

*Change request (CR) 6960 specified the basic timely filing standards established for FFS reimbursement, which are a result of Section 6404 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (ACA) that states that claims with dates of service on or after January 1, 2010, received later than one calendar year beyond the date of service will be denied by Medicare.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Posted in: Medicare & Reimbursement

Leave a Comment (0) →