Posts Tagged eClinicalWorks

image_pdfimage_print

How Are Physicians Returning to Private Practice?

Cresting Wave

The healthcare industry has gone through a lot of change very quickly in the past five years, with still more to come. Independent practices and smaller physician groups have a lot of reason to “seek higher ground” in mergers, partnerships, and buyouts by larger groups and hospitals that have the resources to better deal with lower reimbursement and increasing regulation. Still, just as we are seeing the crest of the wave of physicians selling their practices to hospitals, we are also beginning to see a lot of the reverse trend – physicians leaving hospital employment and starting their own practices.

We have a number of new solo physician practices among our clients and each of these practices can make the numbers work for the three reasons outlined below. Their new practices may look much different from the practices they once had, but they now can bypass the crushing financial burden of start-up costs and find ways to cut expensive overhead. As hospitals ratchet down physician salaries and present new hoops from them to jump through, more and more physicians will look to these new tools for independence and financial viability.

Free EMR

In 2008 I was living in Seattle and I attended a conference at Microsoft in Redmond, Washington. It was there that I met Dr. Bill Crounse, the Senior Director of Worldwide Health for Microsoft. He was kind enough to sit down for a few minutes and talk to me about the future of physician practices. He told me something at the time that I didn’t really understand. He said, “Something is about to happen that will be  game changer for physicians.” At the time I didn’t understand what he meant, but today I believe he was hinting of the pending launch of Practice Fusion, the first free electronic medical record (EMR.)

The free EMR has indeed been a game changer for physicians. The ability to e-prescribe and report PQRS to avoid Medicare financial penalties and to collect the EHR Stimulus money (aka Meaningful Use) without the typical $25 -$30K outlay per physician has been a boon for many practices. How can an EMR be free? With advertising and the agreement that they blind and sell your data to third parties. (Have EMR companies been doing this all along and not telling you? A topic for another post.)

Physicians still need a billing system to run their businesses, but today software vendors are bundling billing packages with practice management and/or EMR software. For anywhere from 2.9% – 5% of net revenue, physicians can use the software and receive insurance billing services as a package. The two largest vendors providing this service are Athena and eClinical Works.

Social Media

The second reason physicians can start a private practice is the replacement of traditional (quite expensive) traditional marketing with social media. For a fraction of the cost of a direct mail campaign, a physician can use social media to establish a digital presence via a website, blog, YouTube and Facebook. These mediums are not free, but they are long tail, meaning that they will continue to drive patients to the practice long after a direct mail postcard has been thrown in the trash.

New Practice Models

Physicians and other care providers have a choice of self-employed practice models today.  Here are a few choices they have:

    • Concierge – concierge can mean different things to different people, but I am using it to describe a practice that accepts insurance and also requires an additional fee from all patients on top of insurance payments.
    • Medicare Subscription – similar to concierge, but applies the additional fee for Medicare patients only to pay for additional services not covered by Medicare, particularly an annual physical examination.
    • Direct Pay – this is a primary care model where patients pay a monthly fee each month that covers unlimited primary care (sick and well visits) and some in-house laboratory services. This model also includes direct-contracting with employers.
    • Telemedicine – gaining popularity for more than just rural specialty care, telemedicine is seeing patients via a secure video connection.
    • House Calls – this model is coming back as a pure practice model because physicians and other care providers do not have to invest in a brick and mortar office. Coupled with the ability to accept payments via their smartphones and the influx of baby boomers, this model is gaining popularity quickly.
    • Nursing Home – Another “rounding” type of practice like the House Call practice, physicians spend 100% of their time in nursing homes seeing patients.
    • On Call Specialty Practice – specialty physicians, typically surgeons, see patients pre and post-surgery in the office of the referring physician and have no brick and mortar office.
    • Cash Practice – this is a 100% cash model with no insurance payments accepted. Typically, physicians will provide patients with what they need to be reimbursed from their insurance plan. Because insurance is not filed, the practice can afford to discount their prices.
    • Co-op Practice – this is a time-share-type practice where one practice or a non-physician owner leases space to physicians, providing everything for one fee except billing, EMR and a medical assistant.
    • Micropractice – an even skinnier form of the co-op practice, the physician works without any assistants and does everything him/herself with just a computer, utilizing one exam room. Micropractice physicians see on average 8 to 10 patients a day.

For more information on different practice models, see our posts Yes, You Can and Should Start a Solo Medical Practice in 2013!How Physicians Can Offer Direct Primary Care to Employers: An Interview with Dr. Samir Qamar of MedLion,  The Direct Pay Physician Practice Model: An Interview With Scott Borden and Physicians are Leaving Hospital Employment and Starting New Practices on Their Own Terms.

If you would like to receive Manage My Practice articles via email, click here to subscribe.

 

(Photo Credit: nathangibbs via Compfightcc)

 

Posted in: General

Leave a Comment (11) →

The First 2011/2012 Certified EHR List: Is Your EHR on the List?

holding my breath until I turn invisible

Image by qwrrty via Flickr

Everybody has been holding their breath to see which EHR software will pass the ONC-ATCB (Office of the National Coordinator for Healthcare IT – Authorized Testing & Certification Body) 2011/2012 certification.  Some will buy a system based on this information, and others will continue on with their system feeling a great sense of relief that the system they’ve already paid for is now certified.  Still others will wonder if their system of choice has applied and failed, or not applied yet.  All this and more information is available on the websites of the three companies that have been approved via the Temporary Certification Program for Health Information Technology.
*
The companies are:
  1. CCHIT (Ed. Note, CCHIT has ceased operations)
  2. Drummond
  3. InfoGard
CCHIT and Drummond announced their first group of certified systems October 1, 2010 and InfoGard has yet to make an announcement.
*
EHR software companies “…are required to provide complete information on the details of their ONC-ATCB 2011/2012 certification, including company and product name and version, date certified, unique product identification number, the criteria for which they are certified, and the clinical quality measures for which they were tested, and any additional software a complete EHR or EHR module relied upon to demonstrate its compliance with a certification criteria,” states the CCHIT website.  This information should be available on the product websites, the certifying body website and the ONCHIT website.
*
As you are reviewing the bolded product names below, notice that the information is split into separate categories for providers and hospitals, is divided based on the company that certified the EHR and is also broken into complete EHRs software versus software modules.

ELIGIBLE PROVIDERS

Complete EHRs for Eligible Providers (CCHIT)

  1. ABEL Medical Software, Inc. for ABELMed EHR – EMR/PM, version 11
  2. Allscripts, Allscripts Professional EHR, version 9.2
  3. Aprima Medical Software, Inc. for Aprima, version 2011
  4. athenahealth, Inc. for athenaclinicals, version 10.10
  5. CureMD Corporation for CureMD EHR, version 10
  6. The DocPatientNetwork.com for Doctations, version 2.0
  7. Epic Systems Corporation for EpicCare Ambulatory – Core EMR, version Spring 2008
  8. GE Healthcare for Centricity Advance, version 10.1
  9. gloStream, Inc. for gloEMR, version 6.0
  10. Intuitive Medical Software for UroChartEHR, version 4.0
  11. MCS – Medical Communication Systems, Inc. for iPatientCare, version 4.0
  12. Medical Informatics Engineering for WebChart EHR, version 5.1
  13. meditab Software, Inc. for IMS, version 14.0
  14. NeoDeck Software for NeoMed EHR, version 3.0
  15. NextGen Healthcare for NextGen Ambulatory EHR, version 5.6
  16. Nortec Software Inc for Nortec Ambulatory EHR, version 7.0
  17. Pulse Systems for 2011 Pulse Complete EHR, version 2011
  18. SuccessEHS for SuccessEHS, version 6.0

EHR Modules for Eligible Providers (CCHIT)

  1. Allscripts for Allscripts Peak Practice, version 5.5
  2. eClinicalWorks LLC for eClinicalWorks, version 8.0.48
  3. NexTech Systems, Inc. for NexTech Practice 2011, version 9.7
  4. nextEMR, LLC for nextEMR, LLC, version 1.5.0.0
  5. Sammy Systems for SammyEHR, version 1.1.248
  6. Universal EMR Solutions for Physician’s Solution, version 5.0
  7. Vision Infonet Inc., for MDCare EMR, version 4.2
  8. WellCentive for WellCentive Registry, version 2.0

Complete EHRs for Eligible Providers (Drummond)

  1. ChartLogic, Inc for ChartLogic EMR 7, version not noted

EHR Modules for Eligible Providers (Drummond)

  1. ifa united i-tech Inc. for ifa EMR, modules 170.302.A-J, 170.302.M, 170.302.O-V (specialized to ophthalmology)
  2. QRS INC. for PARADIGM, version 8.3, modules 170.302.A-W, 170.304.A,  170.304.C-J

HOSPITALS

Complete EHRs for Hospitals (CCHIT)

  1. Epic Systems Corporation for EpicCare Inpatient – Core EMR, version Spring 2008

EHR Modules for Hospitals (CCHIT)

  1. Allscripts for Allscripts ED, version 6.3
  2. Health Care Systems, Inc. for HCS eMR, version 4.0
  3. PeriGen for PeriBirth, version 4.3.50
  4. Prognosis Health Information Systems for ChartAccess, version 4
  5. T-System Technologies for T-SystemEV, version 2.7
  6. Wellsoft Corporation for WellsoftEDS, version 11

Posted in: Electronic Medical Records

Leave a Comment (1) →

Why I Think WalMart Selling EMRs is a Good Thing

shoppingcart

I think WalMart selling EMRs is a good thing and here’s why.

  1. This challenges standard thinking about EMR vendors.  You can’t deny that this has given all of us a lot to think about as far as what company can sell what products to what customers.
  2. This demystifies EMRs and will do a lot to educate the public about EMRs and will most likely start patients asking practices if they use an EMR.
  3. This will break open the discussion about price and allow more open comparisons between EMRs.  Regardless of whether you think the advertised price is a bargain or not, Wal Mart gives everyone a benchmark by saying “This is our price for an EMR.”

Here’s a great article on the announcement/leak and an interview with eClinicalWork’s Girish Kumar, and lots and lots of interesting comments!

Posted in: Electronic Medical Records, Headlines

Leave a Comment (0) →

Nuance (Dragon) Comments on Blocking the Consumer Edition from EMR Integration

©Lidian Neeleman/Dreamstime.com

©Lidian Neeleman/Dreamstime.com

My August 20th post (read it here) noted that Dragon voice recognition software has been quietly gaining acceptance as a mainstream solution to hefty transcription costs and EMR integration. 10% of the healthcare providers in the United States are currently using Dragon Medical.

Yesterday, HISTalk noted that:

At least one doc is unhappy that Nuance has blocked the use of Dragon Naturally Speaking with EMRs in Version 10. Nuance states “…we found that some large hospitals were using the consumer editions of Dragon and not getting the accuracy, quality and manageability that would be achieved when using Dragon Medical.”

Nuance responded on HISTalk via comment, saying in part:

“Nuance has made a significant investment in building, tuning and distributing Dragon Medical for exclusive use by the health care industry. The integration and engineering required to deliver the ease-of-use of Dragon Medical with all major EMR vendors, including Allscripts„¢, Epic, Misys®, GE® Healthcare, NextGen®, Siemens, eClinicalWorks, Meditech, McKesson®, Cerner and Eclipsys®, requires a Herculean effort, comprising thousands of man hours in developing and testing. As one would expect, there is a premium associated with the delivery of this capability and the resources devoted to further hone and evolve the product to meet the specific needs of the medical end user.”

Nuance also points to the Microsoft model of charging differently for enterprise/professional software and consumer software offerings.

I don’t dispute a vendor’s right to charge accordingly for a product that has taken a lot of R & D to bring to the market, but like everything else that has a place in the medical world, it will cost much more based on the healthcare application. A set of plastic drawers for home costs $9.99 at your local store and lists for $99.99 in a medical catalog.

Posted in: Electronic Medical Records, Innovation

Leave a Comment (1) →